9.3 - Blog 9: Ethical Issues in the News|Racist Fraternity|

 In this blog I'll be writing about a situation that happened on the campus of the University of Oklahoma. The scenario was several fraternity kids taking part in a racial chant. The chant included ideas of lynching and hate crimes against other students of different races. The president of the university is quoted saying, 

"I have emphasized that there is zero tolerance for this kind of threatening racist behavior at the University of Oklahoma.". Such speech is hateful and threatening to other students trying to be there. Also, it violates school policies on free admission to extra-curricular activities within the school. Ethically it's a nightmare. Racism has obvious repercussions such as violence and further hurt. Racism ultimately goes back to the core morals of the individual. If one's morals are soaked in hatred and violence then the outcome can become racism. 

References:

Murphy, S. (n.d.). Retrieved March 10, 2015, from http://news.yahoo.com/fallout-continues-univ-oklahoma-over-racist-video-054431982.html. 

8.3 - Blog 8: Ethical Issues in the News

"Feds fight 'maternity tourism' with raid"

This past week dozens of "maternity houses were raided by ICE and similar government agencies. These houses were used to lodge foreign women who would pay to come to the United States for the sole purpose of giving birth. If they had a child in the United States then they could claim citizenship. The main idea is that the passport and social security number can come in handy if the families ever decide to leave their home country. Ethically the practice is entirely unethical and totally illegal. It brings into question the idea of all man kind being equal and having the same rights to freedom. Yes, we are all entitled to it, but there are certain hoops you must jump through to legally achieve it.. The practice is solely based on monetary gain by Americans, and the practice is disheartening for the reader. Here is a link to the article found on CNN: 

http://www.cnn.com/2015/03/03/us/maternity-tourism-raids-california/index.html,

References: 

Martinez, M. (2015, March 03). "Feds Fight 'Maternity Tourism' With Raid". 

Retrieved from: http://www.cnn.com/2015/03/03/us/maternity-tourism-raids-california/index.html.

7.3 - Blog 7: Ethical Issues in the News|Terror Children

Here is a very touching image of an American soldier holding a child. Ethically it can be seen that children have no place in war, especially around the horrors of it. News has been circulating about ISIS using children for the next generation of terrorists. It's been confirmed that children were used in several suicide bombing missions throughout the past as well. There have been video of small children as young as 5 years old committing heinous crimes such as executing people. In one instance a child was told to execute two men by shooting them repeatedly in the head- an act that he did indeed do. The children are virtually brainwashed and turned in terror laden fighting machines; intent on harming the world and promoting terror in the world. Ultimately it breaks whatever theories of morals or ethics you could have. How can humans be so morally downtrodden? Does this rewrite the theory of universal morality?





















References:
Unknown author. (2015, Febuary 23). Terror trainees: New ISIS video shows indoctrination of kids as young as 5. Fox News. Retrieved from http://www.foxnews.com/world/2015/02/23/terror-trainees-new-isis-video-shows-indoctrination-kids-as-young-as-5/?intcmp=latestnews.

6.4 - Blog 6: Ethical Issues in the News

Today I'm going to be discussing a recent article I found on the new innovation that is sweeping the battlefield, as well as the civilian aviation community. The technology is something you've more than likely heard of as it's been around for a few years. Drones, also known as Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS), are the technology I'm referring to. According to Osborn with Fox News (2015), "There is still a robust military market for small UAS. We’re getting a lot of requests for demonstrations all the time. Everyone around the world saw how valuable these assets were in our latest conflicts. Everybody wants them,” he said.". (quoting the business director of development for Lockheed Martin)
Small versions of the large drones (such as the predator and other combat drones) are becoming the future in the aviation world. Apparently there's quite an economy for them, and globally it's been growing fairly consistently.
What are the implications of an unmanned aerial system in wartime use? Ethically how does it match up to utilitarianism for the complete good of mankind? I would argue that it actually follows the utilitarian idea in the fact that it saves more good lives then traditional boots on the ground fighting. Yes, it does put a lot of pressure and stress on the drone pilots, but in the end many lives are saved or potentially saved by using these small drones.


References:
Osborn, K. (2015, February 17). Global Market Growing for Miniature Drones. Retrieved from http://www.foxnews.com/us/2015/02/17/global-market-growing-for-miniature-drones/.

5.4 - Blog 5: Ethical Issues in the News| Three People Slain Execution Style

In Rock Hill, NC the atmosphere is that of a typical college town. The late night parties, fraternities, and sororities are common. However, this week the county had a wake up call that would scare the pants off of any normal person. In an apartment complex near University of North Carolina three people were killed... execution style. All three individuals were of the Muslim religion and thus the crime has been dubbed a hate crime. The alleged shooter has been taken into custody on three counts of first-degree murder. The victims were all decent people with backgrounds full of volunteer work for the homeless people in the country of Turkey. All three victims were students taking classes at the nearby university and the fellow students have shown great support in this tragedy.
A question that arises is, "why"? Why would the shooter feel the need to go against all things ethical and moral to commit such a heinous crime? It has been speculated that he was part of an anti-muslim group, and openly made anti-religious comments on social media. However, this is a good illustration of people acting in selfishness under a just cause. The media has done a good job of promoting the negative side of Muslims, in light of ISIS and the terrorist acts committed by radical Muslims throughout the years. This isn't to say that it's their fault or that they had any part in the killings. It's just to show the effect the media has and the power that they are privileged to have in today's society.

Here's a link to the article if you're interested in reading it.
http://www.foxcarolina.com/story/28079452/were-three-slain-for-their-religion-or-their-parking-space

4.3 - Blog 4: Ethical Issues in the News

While I was researching for this blog I came across an interesting article that immediately captured my full attention. The article was on the reasons behind ISIS brutality and horrendous acts against mankind. The Jordanian pilot, the Japanese execution, etc. all contribute to the totally twisted idea that mankind has limits to what he is capable of. Some people argue for the common good in people; which would bring up the question of how this could happen if that was the case. Others would argue that there is no common good in mankind and it's relative to the situations people are placed in. The questions surrounding ISIS are ethically and morally related. They do their dirty work in the name of their "morality" or their "ethics", but how could a human treat another human like this? Surely there are "universal laws" that describe situations like this. There must be some sort of general universal truth regarding these kinds of people, right? Here is a link to the article I found, and I hope that maybe it would help you answer some of the questions in your own mind.


http://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/feb/08/isis-islamic-state-ideology-sharia-syria-iraq-jordan-pilot

4.3 - Blog 4: Ethical Issues in the News| Superbowl XLIX

    This coming Sunday is probably America's most unofficial, official holiday. It's known around the country as Superbowl Sunday, but the difference between years past and this one is certain ethical events leading up to it.

   If you watch sports news at all, or listen to it on the radio; you will have heard something about the "deflate-gate" as they're calling it. By them I mean the sports media and the NFL. There is an investigation going on right now about whether or not the New England Patriots purposefully deflated 11 of their 12 footballs (which makes them easier to grip) in the AFC Championship game against the Indianapolis Colts. While the score (45-7) is pretty appalling, this development seems to have made more headlines than the actual game.

   While most people focus on the "who done it" aspect, I would like to examine it through the eyes of an ethics student. Ethically we find that there are probably three universal values (as suggested by James Rachels). They are: A policy of caring for small children and infants, a rule against lying, and a rule against murder. The Patriots deflate-gate falls into the second category (based on what the media is portraying). A person is innocent until proven guilty; however, some opposing fans have seemed to forget that. Now that I'm off topic let me do an about-face back to my ethics topic. I found it interesting that no matter who the fans are; whether they be Patriots fans, Colts fans, or Seahawks fans, they all want to know the truth, What is the truth concerning this NFL predicament? Some want it to jaunt the other rivals, but most people are just curious as to what really happened. This whole scenario just seems to back up the idea that universally there is some form of goodness and ethics in people. The unspoken rule against lying goes a long way, even in today's world.

   Whatever the outcome is, I know they will get to the bottom of this dilemma. Either way I'll be enjoying the superbowl with friends and family, and I hope you'll be doing the same.




References used:

Alesia, M. (2014, January 22). Sports ethics experts analyze Belichick, 'DeflateGate'. [Web log]. Retrieved from http://www.indystar.com/story/sports/nfl/colts/2015/01/22/sports-ethics-deflategate-bill-belichick-new-england-patriots-indianapolis-colts/22153199/.

Rosenstand, N. (2013). The Moral of the Story: An Introduction to Ethics. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.

|Ethical Issues in the News 2.3|Afgan Villager Seeks Asylum in U.S.

 Lone Survivor- a true story about a team of Navy SEALS in Afghanistan. Recently, I found an article on the Afghan villager who saves Navy SEAL Marcus Lutrell in the movie. The same villager is a real individual who lives in Afghanistan to this day. Recently, he's been trying to gain access to the United States. The reason being his safety and fear for his life. He has been receiving death threats from terrorists, specifically because of his part in saving Marcus Lutrell. He visited the United States in 2013 for the release of the movie in which he is portrayed as the lifesaver of Marcus Lutrell. Currently, the Department of Homeland Security is checking into his files and reasoning whether it would be beneficial to bring him into the United States. According to the Department of Homeland Securities website, people may seek "asylum" in the United States in cases of persecution from foreign groups. Lott (2015) quotes Michael Wildes (the pro-bono attorney taking the case for Mohammad Gulab) as saying, “He is not safe until he’s on U.S. soil." What do you think the Department of Homeland Security should do? What do your morals and ethics tell you about the situation? Mine tell me that he showed humanitarian aid to a US military member, and should be treated in the same manner. Why is this article making national news? Who is this seemingly obsolete villager that is now known worldwide?
 For today's topic I decided to focus on something related to the movie community, and also the military world. Many people are familiar with the movie
   How does this tie in with the study of ethics and morals? In chapter two of the textbook, the relationship is shown between stories and morals lessons. I personally believe that the movie Lone Survivor had a huge role in the publication of Mohammad Gulab, and how he cared for one of our own military members overseas. According to Rosenstand (2013), "Another philosopher, Philip Hallie, states that without feelings of the victims of evildoing, we can't hope to understand what a moral sense is all about." ... "Without sympathy for other people, our principles may go astray. On of the ways in which we can engage both our sympathy and our moral principles is thorough stories.".
   I would venture to say that the name Muhammad Gulab would be just another name if it wasn't for the movie which portrayed his courageous actions. His actions are told in a story-like manner on the big screen. Because of it, we sympathize for him and also for his situation. It goes to show that this movie is a paradigm of what it means to connect our sympathy and moral principles; then to see them appear off screen in reality.









References:

Lott, M. (2015). "Afghan villager who saved Navy SEAL in hiding, seeking US asylum". Retrieved from: http://www.foxnews.com/us/2015/01/19/afghan-villager-who-saved-navy-seal-in-hiding-seeking-us-asylum/


US Citizenship and Immigration Services. (2013, January 22). Retrieved from: http://www.uscis.gov/humanitarian/refugees-asylum/asylum


Rosenstand, N. (2013). The Moral of The Story: An Introduction to Ethics. New York, NY. McGraw-Hill Publishing.

|Ethical Issues in Today's News| California girls high school basketball coach suspended after 161-2 victory

   How does the title of this post make you feel? What information on morals or ethics can you glean just from the title in this article? The article I found for my first post comes from sunny San Bernadino, California; where the setting is a high-school girls basketball game. The motive for the article is to show the lack of ethics displayed by a coach in his unprofessional and unsportsmanlike conduct. To shorthand the article, Arroyo Valley High-school beat Bloomington High-school 161-2. Despite the large margin of victory, the coach for the winning team played a full-court press the entire game. However, this account doesn't match up very well with his story. Daniels (2015) "He tried to slow the onslaught by benching his starters at halftime and telling his reserves to burn the shot clock before trying to score. A running clock isn't allowed until the fourth quarter under current high school rules." The coach is also quoted saying, "I didn't think it would be that bad". It would appear that the coach (Anderson) was trying to be "humane" in his treatment of the other team. However, his actions in letting his team win with a 159 point difference would say otherwise. The question that came to my mind is "why". Why would you blow out a team that badly just to show dominance. Obviously, in all sports or competitions there is a certain level of pride and competition to be expected. Every person wants to have "that team" that has the manpower or individual skills to destroy the opposition. However, I think all of us can conclude that there is a limit to how far it goes, and to what extend it is considered reasonable. I would venture to say that coach Anderson took it to the level that the game wasn't intended to be taken to. 

    Let's get back to the ethics, or lack of, in this new article. If we consider how our emotions play into our morals (and ethics) then we can come to several neat conclusions. Above I asked how it made you feel to hear about one basketball team destroying another team. Ironically, there are two separate emotions present in this said article. One emotion being joy- the joy that comes from a hard-earned victory. The other emotion that is present is that of anger or hurt. Hurt often follows anger and is forced to follow in anger's footsteps. Although I wouldn't necessarily say that anger from the coach is present in this scenario, it is something to be noted. As I was saying, the emotions of hurt and joy are on two different ends of the spectrum. Having both of these present creates a unique situation. In the textbook it describes morals in union with emotions. Rosenstand (2013) states that, "...other voices are adding that a good moral argument is compelling not just because of its logic but also because it makes sense emotionally. If we have no feeling of moral approval or outrage, then do we really care about whether something is morally right or wrong?" (pg. 19) This goes to show that having emotions is a huge part of having morals and thus ethics with which to confirm our moral standards. 

   In the case of the basket ball article it can and should be said that the coaches ethics were in question. However, in seeing that situation we can tune ourselves for that kind of scenario. How would we react or act in that situation? Another quote taken from the article- Marshall (2015), "I've known him for about seven years... He's a great X's and O's coach. Ethically? Not so much," he said. "He knows what he did was wrong.". After serving his suspension the coach has a chance to change and make it up to his team and peers. Hopefully he learned a valuable lesson in ethics that each of us can take something away from.

Reference List:

Daniels, T. (2015, January 16). California High School Girls Basketball Coach Suspended After Massive Win. Bleacher Report. Retrieved from http://bleacherreport.com/articles/2332169-california-high-school-girls-basketball-coach-suspended-after-massive-win?utm_source=cnn.com&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=editorial 

Rosenstand, N. (2013). The Moral of The Story: An Introduction to Ethics. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill